Stingray Corvette Forum banner

1 - 6 of 6 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
489 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Enjoy, hopefully this is not a double post.

713 RWHP........sick!

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
579 Posts
Thank you. First time I saw this information. Wonder how you transmit 713 RWHP to the ground without excessive tire spinning?
Very Carefully..... :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: elegant and Red-Ray

·
Registered
Joined
·
489 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Thank you. First time I saw this information. Wonder how you transmit 713 RWHP to the ground without excessive tire spinning?
I am sure getting a good start without a lot of tire spin would be difficult but I would love to give it a try:D
 
  • Like
Reactions: elegant

·
Registered
Joined
·
89 Posts
Thank you. First time I saw this information. Wonder how you transmit 713 RWHP to the ground without excessive tire spinning?
Not saying the torque is low. But having 100+ difference in torque probably helps.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
124 Posts
I'd say the cam choice contributed to that as much or more than using a centrifugal charger. (Which is my choice of charger for most builds by the way)


Looking at the numbers, I'd guess they went to a non VVT cam. In the Camaro world we've been doing both, at the track the VVT cam cars have been running faster due to the big torque numbers, without sacrificing high RPM numbers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sinner
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Top