The C8 owners manual for 2023 says 91 octane is reccommended. That was true for the C7 2014 to 2016. In 2017 Chevy changed the reccomendation for the C7 to be 93 octane.
For 2020 and '21, the OM said 93 was required, 91 could be used with a loss of performance. In 2022, they changed it to 91 required. No one outside of GM knows if there were actual changes to the engine / fuel system that allows the car to run better on '91, or if GM just got tired of owners in California complaining they couldn't get 93. The consensus on the internet (which
MUST be true, right?

) is the second.
In either case, running 91 won't hurt your car, it will
potentially cause the ECU to retard timing, which effects performance and mileage. I suspect only under heavy load or in high heat would you notice the difference. And at higher altitudes, octane requirements are reduced (which is why in high altitude areas 91 is generally the highest you can find.).
87 Octane? Under light load, in moderate to cold temps, it's doubtful you'll have any problems. I wouldn't run it in hot temps, or when I'm going to be running the car hard. In fact, I wouldn't run it at all unless it was all I could find when I really needed gas.
I agree with Yellow n Red, though. If you do the math, the difference in cost is pretty minor. If you can afford $40K, $60K, $80K, or $100K for a car, is it worth putting lower octane fuel in it to save a few bucks? If you average 15 mpg, and put 10,000 miles a year on your car (probably a lot more than most owners do), you're using 666 gallons of gas. If Premium costs 50 cents a gallon more, you're spending an extra $333 a year. If you only put 5000 miles a year on, only $116. If that's a hardship, you probably can't really afford a Corvette.